Top 20 heroes you should ban in ranked. Based on win rates, pick rates, versatility, matchup dominance, and KDA from top-ranked matches.
#1 in Support & Jungle & Offlane and #1 overall WR. Ban to remove the top threat from 3 lanes.
#1 Carry and #3 overall WR at 52.9%. No counters. With 3 viable roles, they're a flex nightmare. Dominant 32% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#8 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 51.7% WR and top 20% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick. Dominant 41% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#1 Midlane and #5 overall WR at 52.2%. Only 2 counters.
#7 overall WR across 4 winning roles — 51.9% WR and top 27% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#6 overall at 52.2% WR as Offlane. Viable in 2 roles. Dominant 33% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#4 overall WR across 4 winning roles — 52.4% WR and top 11% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#16 overall — 35.8% pick rate with 50.1% WR across 2 roles. Dominant 36% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#13 overall WR with top 13% KDA. Their 2.5 KDA as Jungle snowballs games.
#2 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 53.9% WR and top 4% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#29 overall — 26.4% pick rate with 49.4% WR across 4 roles.
#11 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 51.0% WR. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#12 overall with only 3 counters as Midlane — "Dominant Pick" tier. 50.9% WR.
#21 overall — 23.0% pick rate with 49.6% WR across 2 roles.
#23 overall — 25.2% pick rate with 49.6% WR in one role.
#19 overall — 23.9% pick rate with 49.9% WR in one role.
#25 overall — 27.0% pick rate with 49.5% WR in one role.
#22 overall — 25.3% pick rate with 49.6% WR across 2 roles.
#14 overall — 12.9% pick rate with 50.6% WR across 3 roles.
#36 overall — 20.4% pick rate with 48.6% WR across 3 roles.
#1 in Support & Jungle & Offlane and #1 overall WR. Ban to remove the top threat from 3 lanes.
#1 Carry and #3 overall WR at 52.9%. No counters. With 3 viable roles, they're a flex nightmare. Dominant 32% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#8 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 51.7% WR and top 20% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick. Dominant 41% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#1 Midlane and #5 overall WR at 52.2%. Only 2 counters.
#7 overall WR across 4 winning roles — 51.9% WR and top 27% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#6 overall at 52.2% WR as Offlane. Viable in 2 roles. Dominant 33% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#4 overall WR across 4 winning roles — 52.4% WR and top 11% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#16 overall — 35.8% pick rate with 50.1% WR across 2 roles. Dominant 36% pick rate, so expect to see them often if unbanned.
#13 overall WR with top 13% KDA. Their 2.5 KDA as Jungle snowballs games.
#2 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 53.9% WR and top 4% KDA. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#29 overall — 26.4% pick rate with 49.4% WR across 4 roles.
#11 overall WR across 3 winning roles — 51.0% WR. Nearly impossible to counter-pick.
#12 overall with only 3 counters as Midlane — "Dominant Pick" tier. 50.9% WR.
#21 overall — 23.0% pick rate with 49.6% WR across 2 roles.
#23 overall — 25.2% pick rate with 49.6% WR in one role.
#19 overall — 23.9% pick rate with 49.9% WR in one role.
#25 overall — 27.0% pick rate with 49.5% WR in one role.
#22 overall — 25.3% pick rate with 49.6% WR across 2 roles.
#14 overall — 12.9% pick rate with 50.6% WR across 3 roles.
#36 overall — 20.4% pick rate with 48.6% WR across 3 roles.
Ban recommendations based on win rate, role dominance, matchup data, and KDA. Data refreshes every 15 minutes from top-ranked competitive matches.